Have a Wood Day

Have a Wood Day

Briol, Peter Zumthor Barbian Dreikirchen, Italy 2007

The Briol guesthouse in Southern Tyrol, Italy, was built in the year 1928 by the painter Hubert Lanzinger. This is a hideout for lovers of the simple "freshness of summer". The mountain guesthouse is at an altitude of 1300 meters. After climbing through forests and mountain meadows, it takes an hour from the village of Barbian to reach it on foot.

Briol is an old-style mountain hotel, intended primarily for summer occupation. Two of the parlours can be heated with wood stoves; the modest bathrooms and toilets are in the hallway. In the spacious rooms with large balconies, old-fashioned washing bowls and jugs of water are placed on wooden tables. Both owners,  Johanna and Urban von Klebelsberg, and log-term guests have no desire to change any of this. 

However, for people who wish or need to have more comfortable facilities, for families with children or for small groups, Peter Zumthor has designed five freestanding "tree houses" on stilts. Situated at the edge of the woods to the west of the old guest house, each of the small buildings consists of one main living room and a large outdoor deck that looks out over the valley with a view of the Dolomites. The combination of such a view and life among the trees is such an impressive experience that the architects have to do little more than provide a good place to be and enjoy. The pile dwellings among the trees are basically annexes of the main building, with their own bathrooms and roomy service spaces. Meals are served in the main building. In winter when there's a lot of snow and the main "Briol" is closed, it will still be possible to use one or another of the small houses because there are wood stoves in the living rooms as well as small cooking niches.



 "Galerie Gross"
Four-bed unit with separate "sleeping knapsack" and a gallery bedroom. Under the gallery facing the mountain: the vestibule and a small kitchen.


"Rucksack"
A tall, slender living room with a view and a separate bedroom suspended above, a "Rucksack" for up to four beds, with a view of the tree tops.



"Mini"
A large room with four beds and a larger balcony, surrounded on three sides by service spaces - the smallest unit, more to sleep in than to live in.



 "Gallerie Klein"
A side entrance with a small kitchen, a tall living room with an outdoor deck, two beds on the gallery and down below a double bed behind the living room.



"Türmchen"
The traditional layout of a parlour with sleeping chamber above it. A long deck in front of the living room and, once again, a U-shaped layer of service spaces acting as a buffer around the living room. 




JOHN HOPE GATEWAY

Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, UK, 2007-09

Address: Arboretum Place, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, Scotland, +44 13 12 48 29 09, www.rbge.org.uk 
Area: 2762m². Client: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Cost: €14 milion


For this space , the architects decided to " frame a view of the garden , which appears between slate walls , crowned by the outstanding wooden deck ." On the ground floor there are exhibition areas and a shop , while on the top floor we find an educational classroom , a restaurant and offices. Given the local weather , the facility also was designed as a " climate refuge." Some walls are opened in the warmer months , although the use of glass encourages contact with the outside even during winter . 


A curved window 60m in length opens to the new biodiversity garden designed by Gross Max, which can be seen from the inside, from the above outside terraces or from the outside , going over a path created for this purpose. One of the principal aims of the design was to achieve low power consumption and minimal waste . Passive strategies were adopted , as well as a biomass furnace , solar collectors for hot water and photovoltaic panels . 


Concerning timber , architects explain this way their project: " The sturdy wooden structure was developed in collaboration with Buro Happold engineers . The coffered ceilings give a unique identity to the space, both in the restaurant and in the rest of the project ".

The site plan shows the location of the structure in the Royal Botanic Garden. The building, in harmony with its environment, alternates  wooden covered facades with large glazings.

                  

The great ceiling height, a considerable amount of natural light and the presence of vegetation make it even more obvious connection to nature.

                   



The glazed area on three of its sides, transmits users the feeling that they can be connected with nature. The sections show the slope of the land and the interior spaces of the building.

































Bern University of Applied Sciences Architecture, Wood & Civil Engineering in Biel/Bienne (Switzerland) Meili & Peter with Zeno Vogel

The school implies the materialization of the reflection about the role that wood  construction plays in modern architecture.

Not only manufacture and assembly new processes are experimented in this project, but also a new approach to the application of this material.

The school raises at the outskirts of the Swiss city of Biel-Bienne ( approximately 40 km away from Bern), in a bordering area of Jura mountain range. 
This project opens a new field of research: the use of wood as a basic construction material to build up a big public building and the possibility of its existence in an urban context.
The building forms part of the enlargement of the ancient school and integrates some pre-existing edifications.

The proportions and dimensions of this building do not correspond to the traditional and preconceived image of a wood construction; that familiar picture which, by contrast, we recognize immediately in the surrounding landscape.

Among this traditional constructions the schools big mass presents a curious classic aspect= cornice, main body and a plinth underlined by a shadow line.
The volume of the school is contained in a big parallelepiped of 94m length, 24m width and 17m height.
The irregular interior distribution does not match with a rigid geometry. Alongside the central corridor arise always changing views.


With a nearly identical distribution, the three first floors contain the different classrooms.
 Last floor, which is arranged with more flexibility, is occupied by the administration and by the offices.
Everything seems to be out of scale, the elements seem child construction game pieces: the big spans, the oversized openings, the giant columns and beams that hold up the roof... the sensation is also felt inside, in the big 11m height wood box that sets up the hall, with its disproportionate radiators and the enormous lighting screens.

Big oak panels organize the façade with horizontal and vertical bands.
In contrast to which is habitual in wood construction, in this case structure performance does not remain hidden behind the cover.
Inside, the truthful leit-motiv is the contrast: disproportionately big doors opposite to excessively low passages.
The concrete central spine acts as a evacuation route in case of fire. It is a monolithic whole with big cantilevers (possibly due to the gradual post-tensed of slabs, structurally independent to the attached wooden big boxes).

The centerpiece is a monolithic structure with an almost sculptural character. The slabs rest on concrete boxes that house vertical circulations and wet areas. They are placed staggered so that, alongside with the irregular arrangement of the terraces, break the monotony of the corridor scheme and force you to follow a zigzag path.
Post-tensioning allowed to suppress expansion joints and to build large overhangs, which have only to support themselves. The post-tensioned of the foundation slab was developed in several phases. Both the concrete core and wooden boxes sit on precast piles, as the solid ground is more than five meters down the surface.

The color takes part in the construction of the space. In the stairwells, yellow enhances the effect of the light running down the wall, while the dark grey emphasizes the differential functioning of the top floor. Bluish gray is applied on the underside of terraces slabs and in the concrete , accentuating the visual relationship between the inside and the outside.
In the project coexist two independent structural patterns associated with the use of two basic materials that complement each other: wood and concrete.
The biggest challenge was to overcome the limits of the rules imposed by the normative of security against fire. This challenge was even greater because architects proposed a building of four storeys. This problem was approached with not only technical but also architectural measures: the long block was divided into independent boxes attached to both sides of a concrete core that works as an escape route.
Starting from the north side, the boxes were lifted one by one, mounting them completely due to their self-supporting capacity.
Floors (A) - wooden alveolar plates - rest provisionally on the beams which in turn rest on either the basement wall, or right over the heads of the piles and an intermediate auxiliary peg.
The corners of the plates (B) are cut, so that the pillars are supported directly by the concrete piles.
On the floors perimeter elements are placed. The wall that faces the hallway, a classic framework (C), covers two modules width and is stiffened with wood-cement boards (D).
The six wooden "boxes" are structurally independent and self-supporting. These contain the classrooms, which volume is adjusted to the structural module, being in this way treated as individual units.
The walls that close each of the boxes are load-bearing walls. The interior slabs rest on the facade slabs and on those which close the hallways, while the lateral slabs support the terraces. The interior partitions dividing the modules are not load-bearing, so that they can be placed according to the size required for each room. Front walls do not work as a lintel system but as perforated panels where all the elements work. 



 The intention was to eliminate the need for partitions in windows, but without increasing the lintels thickness- this corresponds to the minimum required by the requirements of fire protection - so that it could not impede the entry of light into the classrooms.
Facade elements (E) act as perforated panels, from which floors are hung once are situated in the perimeter.
The lateral walls of the first floor (G) support the terraces and the enclosure of the upper floors.
 The facade is a structural surface in which all the parts are working.  It is constructed by prefabricated components of two modules width covering the height of a floor.



 Once the next slab is arranged (B), the ring corresponding to the new floor is constructed. The side walls (C), as they have not to support heavy loads, are from the second floor simple frameworks.


Large eaves unify different elements below. They are merely a formal game, or maybe a very important part of a design aimed to protect the wood, because they reduce the action of atmospheric agents on the facade. The north wall is totally blind.
Boards that cover walls are formed by a frame (A) and several untreated oak tables (B), reinforced with dovetailed  wedges (C). They are laterally screwed to the structure with folded sheets (D) fixed to the frame. 
The basic skeleton of the deck is solved with porches formed by big box beams.
In the floor, an acoustic insulation and a sand base, avoid contact points between pavement and structure, eliminating the transmission of impact noise.
The wooden structure is self-supporting and never rests on the concrete structure. The gap left between the timber frame and concrete slab is used for housing installations.
The impressive space of the lobby, which occupies the north wall, has a height equivalent to three floors and communicates directly with the old dining room, preserved as an attachment of the new building. Its facades, covered of pine wood, contribute to the feeling of being inside a box of a disproportionate size. In the absence of slabs or other lateral elements, the wood covering based in wooden panels stabilizes the walls.